Saturday, June 3, 2023

Do You Know Where Your Money Is Coming From? Navigating Today's Lending Market

There is no doubt that the real estate market has been a wild ride since the pandemic changed the normal course of our lives over two years ago. Lending did not escape the effects of Covid-19, and many active investors have learned more about the loan process than they ever did before the pandemic.  

In the spring of 2020, some lenders left active investors in a bind, closing their doors or halting lending while they evaluated the new risks in the marketplace. Over two years later, the market is changing again, and investors need to know how to pivot to keep their pipeline flowing. While everyone is watching rates increase, they are taking their eyes off the real question right now: Can they close this loan?

Realizing a preapproval and rate and term sheet are not set in stone will go a long way in the current lending environment. Lenders are changing underwriting criteria, not making as many or any exceptions to lending guidelines, and lowering loan-to-value midstream in the escrow process. Most investors never thought about the source of their capital before March 2020. The most concerning part of the lending process was getting through underwriting and receiving the message that you were approved and cleared to close. Whatever happened behind the scenes inside the lending machine wasn’t a concern to an active investor. As long as money made it to the closing table, they were happy. This strategy worked until the capital never made it to the closing table. 

When lenders suddenly turned off the spigot to cheap capital, investors scrambled to save deals any way they could. This pushed private lenders with their own capital to lend to the forefront in the hunt for leverage. Active investors scrambled to find funding or negotiate contract extensions to restart the lending process.

Private lenders who lend their own capital have more control. Large nationwide or even regional lenders have significant strings attached to the capital they lend out, and those strings are pulled by forces outside the lender’s control. 

For example, large institutional lenders are often funded by lines of credit from banks or even selling their loans on the secondary market. In both of those cases, there is another entity establishing what they can lend out, where they can lend it, and the pricing of those loans. These lenders require the line of credit to stay open or the capital markets to continue purchasing loans, so they have enough liquidity to keep new loans coming into the pipeline. 

What does that mean for you as a borrower? It means that the rates and terms you are quoted may suddenly change, or funding, in general, may be halted at a moment’s notice. So how can you protect your real estate investing business in this period of turbulence? 

Start asking questions about how the lender acquires their capital and diversify lending sources based on where they get their capital.

The Four Types of Lenders

For the sake of simplicity, you can think of capital in one of four buckets for alternative lending: national lenders, regional lenders, local lenders, and private loans from a lender who lends their own capital, including seller financing. While there are many flavors and options within each bucket, knowing the general purpose of each can help you decide what type of financing to use for which project. 

Alternative lending automatically means it is not going to be the conforming conventional loans you may have used to purchase your own home. Since they are non-conforming loans, the variables offered are numerous and vary greatly. Having a conversation with your lender about the types of projects they fund and general guidelines for their loan products can go a long way to choosing the right lender for the right project. 

National Lenders

National lenders are pretty easy to locate. Their brand and names are spoken widely across online platforms, forums, and even REI meetings. Their business model has the borrower and decision maker for the loan the furthest removed from each other. To these lenders, every application and, ultimately, file on their desk is a series of numbers and check marks. A business model like this shows up to the active investor (borrower) with high single-digit interest rates and lower fees, but those come at the cost of higher documentation requirements, full third-party appraisals, and a longer closing time. This group of lenders is often very sensitive to changes in the capital markets or economic outlooks. If you need a deal to close super quickly with minimal documentation, this may not be the best tool to use. On the other hand, if you have time for the closing such as a refinance into permanent debt, this may be a great option to pursue.

Regional Lenders

Regional lenders may not have the brand recognition of “the big guys,” but within their markets, they can be relatively well known. Their mid-range interest rates and somewhat higher fees often come with lower requirements for documentation and longer financing timeframes than national lenders. Depending on the lender, they may require a full appraisal or may opt to do an online valuation through a third party. These regional lenders can be a great option for borrowers that have some unique borrowing challenges, such as new employment or acquiring financing as a new business entity. 

Local Lenders

Local lenders tend to be smaller asset-backed lenders or smaller bank/credit unions in the market. They tend to lend in just a certain area of a state or the entire state if it’s small enough (such as Delaware or Rhode Island). These local lenders usually have higher rates, especially if they are asset-backed, but also usually have low or no documentation requirements. This translates through to a borrower with higher rates and usually higher fees. These asset-based lenders can often close quicker and use some sort of in-house valuation methods for the real estate securing the loan. Credit unions may also use the same valuation tools but often want a higher level of documentation to understand the lending opportunity. For investors operating in one particular market, this classification of lender tends to be the most helpful since they are local. This class of lenders understands the market they are lending in and has experience with other lending opportunities in the same area.

Individuals

Lastly, we will look at loans that come from individuals, or what we term “private lenders .”These loans come from capital that an individual or their business entity has. These individuals are often seeking to have passive income or put their retirement funds to work in real estate versus the stock market. Depending on the amount of capital they have available to them, they may not always have the liquidity to fund a loan when the capital is needed. Many of these lenders work with established networks of borrowers, sometimes rolling capital from one deal to the next with the same borrower. These lenders may have very low documentation requirements, flexibility on the type of properties they are willing to lend on, and vary in terms of interest rates, fees, and length of the loan. They also can generally close very quickly, sometimes within a few days if needed. While they won’t be the cheapest or longest-term loan out there, the flexibility this type of lender offers more than makes up for it. 

The Type of Lender Determines the Variables

As you can see, there is somewhat of a correlation between the documentation and underwriting guidelines and the rate being charged. When you, as a borrower, can show the standards a lender believes are lower risk, you can then be rewarded with a lower rate. In addition, other value-add components can also increase annualized interest rates and fees being charged. If a lender can get a deal closed in three days with minimal documentation, that can be a more expensive loan because the borrower needs to move quickly or is unable or unwilling to go through a more thorough vetting process for the loan. 

Conclusion

Understanding what your needs are for financing each property really allows you to find not just a lender but the right lender for the job. The lender’s ability to close the loan is more important than rates and terms right now. Ask questions about the lender’s access to capital and if that access is likely to change in the next several weeks. Depending on the size of the lender you are speaking with, they may not be able to answer that question, but thinking about this as a borrower can never hurt to consider. Keeping another lender in your back pocket that may be able to close quickly, even if it is a higher rate, maybe the difference between closing or not.

 

Receive a Loan Quote from eXp Commercial's Capital Markets Partner CommLoan Thousands of Loan Programs. Hundreds of Lenders. One Commercial Real Estate Lending Platform. One-stop shopping and unprecedented access to the capital markets.

[sc name="financing"][/sc]

 

 

 

Source: Do You Know Where Your Money Is Coming From? Navigating Today’s Lending Market

https://www.creconsult.net/market-trends/do-you-know-where-your-money-is-coming-from-navigating-todays-lending-market/

Friday, June 2, 2023

What You Should Know About Real Estate Valuation

Estimating the value of real estate is necessary for a variety of endeavors, including financing, sales listing, investment analysis, property insurance, and taxation. But for most people, determining the asking or purchase price of a piece of real property is the most useful application of real estate valuation. This article will provide an introduction to the basic concepts and methods of real estate valuation, particularly as it pertains to sales.

Key Takeaways

  • Valuing real estate is difficult since each property has unique features such as location, lot size, floor plan, and amenities.
  • General real estate market concepts like supply and demand in a given region will certainly play into a particular property's overall value.
  • Individual properties, however, must be subject to appraisal, using one of several methods to ascertain a fair value.

Real Estate Valuation: What You Should Know

 

Basic Valuation Concepts

Technically speaking, a property's value is defined as the present worth of future benefits arising from the ownership of the property. Unlike many consumer goods that are quickly used, the benefits of real property are generally realized over a long period of time. Therefore, an estimate of a property's value must take into consideration economic and social trends, as well as governmental controls or regulations and environmental conditions that may influence the four elements of value:

  • Demand: the desire or need for ownership supported by the financial means to satisfy the desire
  • Utility: the ability to satisfy future owners' desires and needs
  • Scarcity: the finite supply of competing properties
  • Transferability: the ease with which ownership rights are transferred

Value Versus Cost and Price

Value is not necessarily equal to cost or price. Cost refers to actual expenditures – on materials, for example, or labor. Price, on the other hand, is the amount that someone pays for something. While cost and price can affect value, they do not determine value. The sales price of a house might be $150,000, but the value could be significantly higher or lower. For instance, if a new owner finds a serious flaw in the house, such as a faulty foundation, the house's value could be lower than the price.

Market Value

An appraisal is an opinion or estimate regarding the value of a particular property as of a specific date. Appraisal reports are used by businesses, government agencies, individuals, investors, and mortgage companies when making decisions regarding real estate transactions. The goal of an appraisal is to determine a property's market value – the most probable price that the property will bring in a competitive and open market.

Market price, the price at which property actually sells, may not always represent the market value. For example, if a seller is under duress because of the threat of foreclosure or if a private sale is held, the property may sell below its market value.

 

Appraisal Methods

An accurate appraisal depends on the methodical collection of data. Specific data, covering details regarding the particular property, and general data, pertaining to the nation, region, city, and neighborhood wherein the property is located, are collected and analyzed to arrive at a value. Appraisals use three basic approaches to determine a property's value.

Method 1: Sales Comparison Approach

The sales comparison approach is commonly used in valuing single-family homes and land. Sometimes called the market data approach, it is an estimate of value derived by comparing a property with recently sold properties with similar characteristics. These similar properties are referred to as comparables, and to provide a valid comparison, each must:

  • Be as similar to the subject property as possible.
  • Have been sold within the last year in an open, competitive market
  • Have been sold under typical market conditions

At least three or four comparables should be used in the appraisal process. The most important factors to consider when selecting comparables are the size, comparable features, and – perhaps most of all – location, which can have a tremendous effect on a property's market value.

Comparables' Qualities

Since no two properties are exactly alike, adjustments to the comparables' sales prices will be made to account for dissimilar features and other factors that would affect value, including:

  • Age and condition of buildings
  • Date of sale, if economic changes occur between the date of sale of a comparable and the date of the appraisal.
  • Terms and conditions of sale, such as if a property's seller was under duress or if a property was sold between relatives (at a discounted price)
  • Location, since similar properties might differ in price from neighborhood to neighborhood
  • Physical features, including lot size, landscaping, type and quality of construction, number and type of rooms, square feet of living space, hardwood floors, a garage, kitchen upgrades, a fireplace, a pool, central air, etc.

The market value estimate of the subject property will fall within the range formed by the adjusted sales prices of the comparables. Since some of the adjustments made to the sales prices of the comparables will be more subjective than others, weighted consideration is typically given to those comparables that have the least amount of adjustment.

Method 2: Cost Approach

The cost approach can be used to estimate the value of properties that have been improved by one or more buildings. This method involves separate estimates of value for the building(s) and the land, considering depreciation. The estimates are added together to calculate the value of the entire improved property. The cost approach makes the assumption that a reasonable buyer would not pay more for an existing improved property than the price to buy a comparable lot and construct a comparable building. This approach is useful when the property being appraised is a type that is not frequently sold and does not generate income. Examples include schools, churches, hospitals, and government buildings.

Building costs can be estimated in several ways, including the square-foot method, where the cost per square foot of a recently built comparable is multiplied by the number of square feet in the subject building; the unit-in-place method, where costs are estimated based on the construction cost per unit of measure of the individual building components, including labor and materials; and the quantity-survey method, which estimates the quantities of raw materials that will be needed to replace the subject building, along with the current price of the materials and associated installation costs.

Depreciation

For appraisal purposes, depreciation refers to any condition that negatively affects the value of an improvement to real property and takes into consideration the following:

  • Physical deterioration, including curable deterioration, such as painting and roof replacement, and incurable deterioration, such as structural problems
  • Functional obsolescence, which refers to physical or design features that are no longer considered desirable by property owners, such as outdated appliances, dated-looking fixtures, or homes with four bedrooms, but only one bath
  • Economic obsolescence is caused by factors that are external to the property, such as being located close to a noisy airport or polluting factory.

Methodology

  • Estimate the value of the land as if it were vacant and available to be put to its highest and best use using the sales comparison approach since land cannot be depreciated.
  • Estimate the current cost of constructing the building(s) and site improvements.
  • Estimate the amount of depreciation of the improvements resulting from deterioration, functional obsolescence, or economic obsolescence.
  • Deduct the depreciation from the estimated construction costs.
  • Add the estimated value of the land to the depreciated cost of the building(s) and site improvements to determine the total property value.

Method 3: Income Capitalization Approach

Often called simply the income approach, this method is based on the relationship between the rate of return an investor requires and the net income that a property produces. It estimates the value of income-producing properties such as apartment complexes, office buildings, and shopping centers. Appraisals using the income capitalization approach can be fairly straightforward when the subject property can be expected to generate future income and when its expenses are predictable and steady.

Direct Capitalization

Appraisers will perform the following steps when using the direct capitalization approach:

Gross Income Multipliers

The gross income multiplier (GIM) method can be used to appraise other properties that are typically not purchased as income properties, but that could be rented, such as one- and two-family homes. The GRM method relates the sales price of a property to its expected rental income. (For related reading, see "4 Ways to Value a Real Estate Rental Property")

For residential properties, the gross monthly income is typically used; for commercial and industrial properties, the gross annual income is used. The gross income multiplier method can be calculated as follows:

Sales Price ÷ Rental Income = Gross Income Multiplier

Recent sales and rental data from at least three similar properties can be used to establish an accurate GIM. The GIM can then be applied to the estimated fair market rental of the subject property to determine its market value, which can be calculated as follows:

Rental Income x GIM = Estimated Market Value
 

The Bottom Line

Accurate real estate valuation is important to mortgage lenders, investors, insurers and buyers, and sellers of real property. While appraisals are generally performed by skilled professionals, anyone involved in a real transaction can benefit from gaining a basic understanding of the different methods of real estate valuation.

   

Source: What You Should Know About Real Estate Valuation

https://www.creconsult.net/market-trends/what-you-should-know-about-real-estate-valuation/

1120 E Ogden

Retail / Office Space For Lease | 3,674 SF | $20/SF NNN
1120 E Ogden Ave, Suite 101 | Naperville, IL 60563
Broker: Randolph Taylor rtaylor@creconsult.net | 630.474.6441

https://www.creconsult.net/retail-office-for-lease-1120-e-ogden-ave-suite-101-naperville-il-60563/?wpo_all_pages_cache_purged=1

9301 Golf

Golf Sumac Medical Offices For Lease | 998 - 2,853 SF | $28/SF MG
9301 West Golf Rd | Des Plaines, IL 60016
Broker: Randolph Taylor rtaylor@creconsult.net | 630.474.6441
https://www.creconsult.net/golf-sumac-professional-building-medical-office-space-for-lease-9301-golf-rd-des-plaines-il-60016/

Thursday, June 1, 2023

Cash on Cash Return vs IRR: Understanding the Difference

For commercial real estate investors, having access to as many metrics as possible to provide insight and comparison opportunities is critical. Various metrics are available, including cash-on-cash return and internal rate of return, enabling investors to compare properties more closely when deciding which to choose for investment. Most investors set their own threshold of what is acceptable to meet their needs or to ensure they hit a certain target before investment. Yet, when investors consider dozens of opportunities each day, it is helpful to have a straightforward metric to help compare properties. These two figures are core components, and knowing the difference between IRR and cash on cash is critical.

What Is Cash on Cash Return (CoC Return)?

The cash-on-cash multiple is a type of rate of return ratio. It provides insight into the total cash earned for a property over the total cash invested into the property. It is based on cash flow before tax within a specific period divided by the equity that’s invested at the end of that period. Cash on cash return (CoC) is a levered metric or an after-debt metric. By comparison, an unlevered metric is “free and clear” returns. Investors use this metric as a way to assess an investment opportunity.

Cash on Cash Return Formula

The formula for cash on cash return is rather simple: Annual Net Cash Flow divided by Invested Equity equals Cash on Cash Return In most cases, this is expressed as a percentage. When it comes to the cash-on-cash calculation, real estate investors typically look at their investment return.

How to Calculate Cash on Cash Return

Applying the formula above, here is an example of how the cash-on-cash works (you can also use a cash-on-cash calculator to help you with this process.) Bob wants to purchase a multitenant property for $1 million. He puts in $250,000 in equity in the deal. He then finances the $750,000. In this example, the equity investment is $250,000. (Now, this does not include things like closing costs which would also be factored into the equity if paid out of pocket). After a year, the property provides an annual rental revenue of $120,000. Mortgage payments on the property total $55,000. In addition, Bob invests another $20,000 into the property improvements. To determine the cash on cash return, the first step is to determine the annual net cash flow for the property. In this situation, the annual cash flow for the property follows this formula:
  • Total Gross Revenue minus Total Expenses
In our example, the annual cash flow is $120,000 minus $75,000 or $45,000. Next, to get the Cash on Cash Return, we need to divide the annual net cash flow by the amount of equity put into the property, in this case, $250,000. The equation is $45,000 divided by $250,000 equals 18%. This figure means that the total cash on cash return for that property is 18%. That also means that the investment’s profit for the year will be 18% of the amount of cash that is invested initially.

What Is a Good Cash-on-Cash Return?

Investors typically need to seek out their own answer to this since it is very much dependent on what their needs are and preferences goals are. For some investors, earning 8 to 10% cash on cash return is enough for them. Others do not consider options under 20% cash on cash yield.

Limitations of Cash on Cash Return

There is no doubt that cash on cash return is an important factor to consider, but it has some limitations. For example, it is a simple calculation that measures investment performance. Use it as a starting point when considering investment properties, and then dig deeper into other metrics for more insight. CoC often does not consider things like the length of investment of operating cash flows within a holding period or the reversion cash flow that comes from the sale of the property later.

What Is IRR (Internal Rate of Return)?

Another key figure is the IRR formula. Understanding IRR in real estate can provide more opportunities for you to see the difference in these funding methods. Cash on cash does not account for what investors call the time value of money, but this is where IRR comes into play. Internal rate of return (IRR) is the interest rate that makes the net present value of all of the property’s cash flow zero. Another way to look at it is the actual annual growth rate calculated by isolating compounding interest’s effects in situations where the investment is more than a year.

Internal Rate of Return Formula

The formula for this metric is complicated and typically not done by hand. Rather, it’s best to utilize Excel or another program for calculating it.

The formula for Calculating IRR

Here is what the formula looks like: In this, Formula for Calculating IRR Ct=Net cash inflow during the period C0=Total initial investment costs IRR=The internal rate of return t=The number of time periods You can learn more about setting up Excel to calculate this by visiting this link.

What Is a Good Internal Rate of Return?

What is a good IRR? Again, that’s subjective and really depends on the investor’s goals and needs. Most of the time, a 5-year IRR should be around 15% or higher, and sometimes it can be much higher than this.

Limitations of IRR

IRR aims to provide insight into the total return on investment by incorporating compounding interest into the process. However, when IRR is high, that does not always mean that the investment is seeing a cash flow at the current time. That is because this metric also uses the final sale or the existing assets as a component of the formula. That makes it impossible to be the only factor considered during this process.

What’s the Difference Between IRR and Cash on Cash Return?

IRR is the total interest earned on the money the investor puts into the project. The difference between this and CoC is that IRR is focused on the total income earned throughout the investor's complete ownership of the property, whereas CoC provides an annual segment view of the property.

Cash on Cash Return vs. IRR: Which One Should You Use?

IRR is much harder to calculate and typically requires having a significant amount of data about the property at the time of estimating. However, it is worth using both metrics. Often CoC is the first step to weed out less-than-desirable properties. Then, before investment, investors take a closer look at these metrics to provide a more comprehensive review of the investment’s opportunities.

Wrapping Up

What is a good cash-on-cash return? When should you use IRR? These are very important questions. The key here is that commercial real estate investors should have as many metrics as possible available to them to use to determine which property could be ideal and which meets their very specific needs or goals. It’s not often a question about which one to use but how a property looks using both of these metrics.  

Source: Cash on Cash Return vs IRR: Understanding the Difference

https://www.creconsult.net/market-trends/cash-on-cash-return-vs-irr-understanding-the-difference/

163 E Lincolnway

Just Listed - 23 Unit Multifamily For Sale
$425,000 | Heavy Value-Add | 20.5% Cap Rate (Proforma)
631 E Lincolnway | Morrison, IL 61270
https://www.creconsult.net/for-sale-heavy-value-add-23-unit-multifamily-property-morrison-il/

Wednesday, May 31, 2023

Chicago Renters Only Make 69% Of The Income Needed To Afford Starter Homes

Chicago Renters Only Make 69% Of The Income Needed To Afford Starter Homes.

The average income of renters in Chicago isn’t quite enough to allow them to afford an entry-level home. And as long as interest rates stay high and inventory is low, that will likely remain the case.

As of October, when interest rates were 7%, the average household income needed to cover a mortgage for a Chicago starter home was $63.4K. But the average income of renters was $43.6K, according to Point2Homes research.

That means Chicago renters make only 69% of the income needed to become first-time homeowners, according to Axios reporting on the study.

Point2Homes data indicates the average cost of a Chicago starter home is $204.7K, effectively pricing out many renters given rising interest rates and shrinking single-family housing stock. Only 15 of the 50 largest U.S. cities offered average starter homes for less than $200K, the traditional affordability cutoff for first-time homeowners. Rising mortgage interest rates, high housing prices, and limited inventory make it harder for people to buy their first homes. According to the report, "the modest, bare-bones homes of yesteryear have become the stuff of myths and legends." About 70% of all new builds were starter homes in the 1940s and 40% in the 1980s, but the percentage had fallen to 7% by 2019, according to Census Bureau figures. "Renters’ homeownership dreams don’t match the reality in almost any of the large U.S. housing markets," the report's authors said. Earlier this year, Business Insider reported that first-time home homeowners struggled to afford the typical 20% down payment on a home, which averaged $78.4K based on median home prices when the article was published in March.
 

Source: Chicago Renters Only Make 69% Of The Income Needed To Afford Starter Homes

https://www.creconsult.net/market-trends/chicago-renters-only-make-69-of-the-income-needed-to-afford-starter-homes/

Multifamily Investment Opportunity – Showings Scheduled Join us for a showing of two fully occupied, cash-flowing multifamily properties ide...